discussion Game+ First Release Content Poll

[elfieeven]

This poll could easily apply to any type of game but I'm curious about Game+ releases since new entries in that category are fairly few and far between (unless we're talking about censored Japanese work), and they typically require a lot more time before things get "Good".

 

[User_58620]

I personally liked if the first release of a game contained some action. It doesn't need to be too much, but just a little bit, so I can be excited about the future releases. If I don't get the minimal action, I don't get excited about the future.

 

[degenmans]

even more important than the amount of content is the quality, it's very easy to just add random scenes with throwaway characters that don't show up again just for filler

 

[elfieeven]

even more important than the amount of content is the quality, it's very easy to just add random scenes with throwaway characters that don't show up again just for filler

Agreed.. not a fan of the whole "sex with someone just to have sex with someone" unless it fits with the story. Such a Sharp Pain did a great job with this.

 

[AlBetGam]

Personally I don't need the first release of a game to have sex scenes. I need it to make me want sex scenes with those characters- and good models and well-written stories are much better at that than trying to find some way to cram in a handy within ten minutes of game start.

 

[joelamasse]

For me I like to discover the story and characters ... so a first release can be only story oriented.

 

[Sol_Invictus]

Would like some actual content besides story. whatever ropes people in.

 

[floydrowx77]

Some good story and little bit of content, not necessarily a sex scene but some teasing or a handy would be nice.

 

[Saturnus]

It's gotta have something beyond the story. At least a little more than nudity. (handy, oral, sex, piss-guzzling-bukkake-hermaphrodite-orgy)

If not, I'll think it's going to be a long, drawn-out wall of text.

 

[Roki1212]

I honestly don't mind that the first release has no action or nudity, etc. I prefer to wait until the game is developed a bit to see what direction it goes and decide if it's worth playing or not.
I just usually don't want to check a game what has 20-30 min of content.

 

[lewdlove]

First release should have a good intro to the setting of the game, and a bit of nudity...

 

[MicoJive]

Honestly it doesnt really matter how much or what kind of content is in a first release. Rarely do I play a game in its first, or even first few releases.

I want to see that a dev is going to commit something to a game before I give it a try. The only exception is when a dev I like releases a new game I'll give those a shot.

But for a new dev, there has to be some content before its worth it for me. I want some P in the V before I give it a go, and if they are the kind of dev that renders the scenes so you cant see anything they just get ignored. I'm completely over scenes that are rendered so you cant see any naught bits during the action.

 

[User_111574]

Basically, the content from Games+ doesn't interest me much. I have nothing against incest, the other topics from there just don't interest me. Although some people like them - you're welcome. It's very depressing to see a lot of games with Japanese graphics (I can't stand it).
And the funny thing is that the games that are of interest to me are openly available on other resources. For example, I was very surprised to see Four Elements Trainer there - I don't know what the story is about (I haven't downloaded it), but it's freely available on other sites.
Overall, I was extremely disappointed with this section.

 

[Squeeky]

An early release is good to get a sense of the creator's style, and sometimes I'll grab a game with a low version for that, but generally I'll use the screenshots and wait until something has had a few revisions. I'm sure the new creators learn a lot each release and so it avoids some bad first impressions if I can give them some time.
Often it's good to get some early action, though most plus games tend to make that MC and a side mature character to showcase the style, but keep the story focus characters behind a story wall, which is fair. Only a few games seem to get away with jumping right into the kiddie pool.

 

[elfieeven]

Basically, the content from Games+ doesn't interest me much. I have nothing against incest, the other topics from there just don't interest me. Although some people like them - you're welcome. It's very depressing to see a lot of games with Japanese graphics (I can't stand it).
And the funny thing is that the games that are of interest to me are openly available on other resources. For example, I was very surprised to see Four Elements Trainer there - I don't know what the story is about (I haven't downloaded it), but it's freely available on other sites.
Overall, I was extremely disappointed with this section.

Games+ has nothing to do with incest

 

[User_111574]

Games+ has nothing to do with incest

What are DMD and Milfcreek doing there then?

 

[elfieeven]

What are DMD and Milfcreek doing there then?

DMD has a friend with very small breasts from what I recall? Never played Milfcreek but is it considered shota?

 

[User_111574]

DMD has a friend with very small breasts from what I recall? Never played Milfcreek but is it considered shota?

No shota/loli in Milfcreek. MOTH might as well be sent to a closed section as MC's age is the same. The girl is DMD is normal, my wife's sister in her forties is 154 centimeters tall and has a very similar figure. She even gets cigarettes and beer only on presentation of her ID card.

 

[elfieeven]

No shota/loli in Milfcreek. MOTH might as well be sent to a closed section as MC's age is the same. The girl is DMD is normal, my wife's sister in her forties is 154 centimeters tall and has a very similar figure. She even gets cigarettes and beer only on presentation of her ID card.

Milfcreek is tagged as shota and DMD is tagged as loli.. hence the Game+. I agree with you that neither should be tagged that way but *shrug* what can yo do..

 

[Marya]

At the very least good storytelling with implied nudity.